philjac94
10-30-2008, 06:17 AM
Can someone comment on the following? The engine has only just gone through its break-in. Bearings are in perfect condition.
Engine crankshaft axial clearance (endfloat) excessive, measured (0.3mm) with fan hub installed and thrust washer fitted. Pulled the engine apart and re-measured, sure enough in laymen terms the crank is too long for the crankshaft housing by 0.3mm. This is never good (in my mind) as this allows the whole crank/clutch/fan assy to move, also, within the engine the conrod bigend/journal & little end/gudgeon relationship alters by this 0.3mm. This was also seen on the backplate, I could rotate the engine while pushing rearwards and hear the bigend journal touch/scrape the backplate. The solution is to either regrind the crankshaft bearing landing or shim the front bearing. I did the latter using a standard 22/16mm wave washer these are 0.25mm thick. The remaining 0.05mm is taken up by the "wave" giving a soft preload. The result is no axial displacement and both bearings equally softly loaded, with still enough room for expansion once at running temp. I don't know which item is wrong as i don't have machine drawings or maybe TT designed the engine that way on purpose but i cannot think of any purpose for allowing an engine to run on the backplate for axial restraint.
Engine crankshaft axial clearance (endfloat) excessive, measured (0.3mm) with fan hub installed and thrust washer fitted. Pulled the engine apart and re-measured, sure enough in laymen terms the crank is too long for the crankshaft housing by 0.3mm. This is never good (in my mind) as this allows the whole crank/clutch/fan assy to move, also, within the engine the conrod bigend/journal & little end/gudgeon relationship alters by this 0.3mm. This was also seen on the backplate, I could rotate the engine while pushing rearwards and hear the bigend journal touch/scrape the backplate. The solution is to either regrind the crankshaft bearing landing or shim the front bearing. I did the latter using a standard 22/16mm wave washer these are 0.25mm thick. The remaining 0.05mm is taken up by the "wave" giving a soft preload. The result is no axial displacement and both bearings equally softly loaded, with still enough room for expansion once at running temp. I don't know which item is wrong as i don't have machine drawings or maybe TT designed the engine that way on purpose but i cannot think of any purpose for allowing an engine to run on the backplate for axial restraint.