PDA

View Full Version : Wireless Transmit.....???


botag
03-18-2007, 12:10 AM
Looking for a link to a wireless camera with good resolution....Perhaps one that comes with a wide angle lens....???? Any leads would be great...!!!

thanks :D

botag
03-18-2007, 01:41 AM
Weird that it posted the topic 3 times...only submitted it once....

j_kookboy
03-18-2007, 01:47 AM
This is the first thing that came up in google... is that what you are looking for ?

http://www.x10.com/products/x10_vk58a.htm

BarnOwl
03-18-2007, 04:47 AM
Weird that it posted the topic 3 times...only submitted it once....

It happens now and then, don't know why. I deleted the duplicate posts but you can also do that yourself after posting: Edit post-delete......

catfight
03-18-2007, 04:41 PM
If you use a 2.4 GHz system (like DX6 or DX7) you cannot use 2.4 GHZ camera downlinks - you would have to use either 900 Mhz or 5.8 Ghz equipment. If using 72 radio Mhz you can use 2.4.

There are many suppliers of 2.4 Ghz like:

http://www.blackwidowav.com/

http://www.aeropix.ch/store/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=1&zenid=5c1ba102107e7d86aa756c37bb8027a3

Mario
03-22-2007, 12:10 PM
Hello Botag..

Try this page RC-EXPERT.COM.. they have a wireles camara about 1 inch square, with reciever (2.4 Ghz) Color video and sound. works great, uses a 9volt batery and also 110V with transformer. I use it in my Trex 450.. about 300' range and for only US$.80.00

[/img]

Mario
03-22-2007, 12:12 PM
Hello Rusty..

I have used my 2.4 Ghz camera with my DX6, and no problems... I imagine the radio will use a free channel to lock on..

Tonystott
03-22-2007, 02:58 PM
Mario, the weight of posts around the traps suggest that there is a real risk of problems using 2.4Ghz for both R/C and D/L. You might have been lucky so far....

Mario
03-23-2007, 04:20 PM
Thank you Tony.. I will definitely stop doing this and change Radio..

daniel reese
05-22-2007, 11:03 PM
How's the video quality from that 2.4g system on your rex?

M Carr
05-23-2007, 07:53 PM
I had one of those on my 450 for a little while. the video quality is what I would call just decent. Of course its not really meant for high definition/fast action videos its made to be a security camera. I did manage to get a few pretty good videos with it though and its really fun to mess around with, especially for a small heli. like the trex450.

If its great/high end video quality you are looking for I wouldnt recommend it. If you are looking for something to just capture some video with and have a little fun with it, I think its great. Its really easy to set up and the 450 hauls it around with no problems at all. Best of all its inexpensive.

aramsdell
05-24-2007, 10:45 PM
I posed these questions to Xtreme Power Systems of their 2.4 ghz conversion systems.
Alan Ramsdell wrote:

> When will you support video downlink from the air?

Never.


> If not soon, how
> does the XPwr Receiver handle a 200 mw 2.4 ghz video downlinkwith say a
> 12 inch separation of the two devices. I want to use a downlink. 2.4
> Ghz is the easiest. Your competitors in the Spread Spectrum arena have
> had problems with a transmitter swamping their receivers. What kind of
> range could I get with that 200 mw Tx on a heli. I would like to get 7
> to 8 hundred feet with no glitches.

We have no idea what the limitation is for 2.4Ghz video with our
product. We have done limited tests with it, and it works with a 1 watt
transmitter, if it is separated by at least 8 inches of space from the
receiver.

1 watt !!! XPS Receiver in back and 1 watt Tx for video up front I guess !