awr
10-01-2007, 03:06 PM
My heli started out as a Raptor 30 V2 and I installed the 30-50 V2 conversion kit.
I'm trying to eliminate as much slop as possible in the head and noticed if I twist the flybar with the
flybar perpendicular to the frame (i.e. main blades pointing front and rear), I can move the leading
edge of the flybar paddle up and down at least 2-3mm, which seems unacceptable to my mind.
I traced the source of the most slop to the joint where the link from the elevator meets the link from
the servo at the point where the pitch arm hinge pin is located.
I've got the full bearing kit installed, and I epoxied the inserts that go around the screws onto the
screws to eliminate play between the screw and the inside bearing race. That reduced some of
the play, but there's still some there.
My question is, why did they include that joint for the elevator control instead of running just one
control rod from the elevator servo to the elevator control arm?
I'm guessing it was to minimize interaction when the pitch arm is going up and down, but I measured
the distance between the ball link on the elevator control arm and the ball link on the elevator servo
(with no links attached), going through the full range of motion (both servo, pitch arm, and elevator
control arm) and there was no change in the distance between the two points.
What problems are created if I make a single link between the elevator servo and the elevator control arm?
I apologize if this question has been asked before.
Wayne
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
I'm trying to eliminate as much slop as possible in the head and noticed if I twist the flybar with the
flybar perpendicular to the frame (i.e. main blades pointing front and rear), I can move the leading
edge of the flybar paddle up and down at least 2-3mm, which seems unacceptable to my mind.
I traced the source of the most slop to the joint where the link from the elevator meets the link from
the servo at the point where the pitch arm hinge pin is located.
I've got the full bearing kit installed, and I epoxied the inserts that go around the screws onto the
screws to eliminate play between the screw and the inside bearing race. That reduced some of
the play, but there's still some there.
My question is, why did they include that joint for the elevator control instead of running just one
control rod from the elevator servo to the elevator control arm?
I'm guessing it was to minimize interaction when the pitch arm is going up and down, but I measured
the distance between the ball link on the elevator control arm and the ball link on the elevator servo
(with no links attached), going through the full range of motion (both servo, pitch arm, and elevator
control arm) and there was no change in the distance between the two points.
What problems are created if I make a single link between the elevator servo and the elevator control arm?
I apologize if this question has been asked before.
Wayne
Calgary, Alberta, Canada