![]() |
|
| Register | FAQ | PM | News | Events | Groups | Blogs | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Unregistered
|
||||||
| Banshee Helicopters Banshee Helicopter Support |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond Va USA
|
How are they getting away with this? Is the boom stronger than a normal one? $60 euro for the boom doesn't sound crazy. Pricy yes but in Line with a $2700 kit.
__________________
TDR, Srimok N x 2, Banshee 31, avant aurora, Dune! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nevada
|
Off of the Banshee website:
30mm strutless boom crafted in fiberglass. Probably is stronger.... Technical features 3-speed belt drive Automatic tail rotor drive belt tensioner/-spring damper Main drive belt tensioner 30 mm fiberglass, strutless, tail boom Straight swashplate linkage Extremely small, compact design with high torsional stiffness Center of gravity close to the rotor plane Double (x2 separate units) needle bearing clutch * Technical*specifications Basic weight of the mechanics including canopy*(not including: motor, servos, regulator, batteries or rotor blades): 1.65 Kg´s All up weight with standard equipment (3xBLS452, 1xBLS251, Jive 120+ HV, Pyro 700-52, BeastX, Maniac3 710 mm, 115 mm tail rotor blades, canopy): approx. 2950 g´s Main rotor blades:* 690-720 mm Tail rotor blades:* 105-120 mm Motor: 65 mm diameter max. Main rotor speed: 1000-2300 r.p.m. Variable reduction ratio between motor and intermediate shaft: 1:4 – 1:2.88 (18–25 drive belt pulley) Reduction ration between*intermediate and main rotor shaft: 1:3 Ratio between main rotor and tail rotor:* 1:5.54 Battery cell size:* Maximum 60 mm width and 60 mm height |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
HF Support
|
I got some 300 CF booms made up for my Diabolo and they are sufficiently stiff IMHO not to need boom supports - I guess it comes down to the weave pattern and the thickness of the wall - I believe the Diabolo was originally tried too without the supports but there was some softness of tail authority MC did not like.
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I have carbon fibre golf driver shafts that can take a real pounding without issues. But they cost a lot more than a regular heli boom.
__________________
Compass Atom 7HV, Scorp HK3 4035 hand wound by Mauro - 6x7x1.32 YY 430KV, CGY750 Beam E4, 6S, looking for a new FBL unit, BX is getting removed! Formerly owned - Blade mCP X V2 - Blade 400 FBL BeastX |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Argentina
|
But it says fiberglass, not carbon fiber. Many helis have true carbon fiber booms and still need boom supports, I though fiberglass was what Banshee team chose for some reason. Which is harder?
__________________
Marcos Banshee #27, 2x TDR, Diabolo, JR Sylphide E12, Voodoo 600, Voodoo 400, Avant Aurora 90N, Rave 450, Gaui X2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
Guess something got lost in translation. Grammar...
I noticed that too, and checked their german page. There it says : "30 mm CFK Heckrohr ohne Streben". Googled CFK to make sure : "Carbon Faserverstärkte Kunststoffe" , so carbon it is.
__________________
minicopter Diabolo, Henseleit TDR, MA Spectra-G, Raptor 50T Futaba 2.4 GHz |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
HF Support
|
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Argentina
|
So only difference with the Diabolo is alu vs CF? Both are 30mm. I wonder why Gerd didn't go with CF to retain one boom support or none. Maybe not wanting to increase the cost and making CF boom mandatory.
__________________
Marcos Banshee #27, 2x TDR, Diabolo, JR Sylphide E12, Voodoo 600, Voodoo 400, Avant Aurora 90N, Rave 450, Gaui X2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
HF Support
|
Quote:
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Argentina
|
Well, alu boom is a pretty good vibe absorber. I don't care for one or the other as long as there is a belt tensioner. The Logo with alu boom was a pain with temperature variation. With CF it is almost perfect. What I mean is I don't mind the designer choosing CF over alu unless there is a clear advantage, and vice versa.
__________________
Marcos Banshee #27, 2x TDR, Diabolo, JR Sylphide E12, Voodoo 600, Voodoo 400, Avant Aurora 90N, Rave 450, Gaui X2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Victoria, Australia
|
I prefer CF due to thermal reasons, but thats about it, cost wise aluminium!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Unregistered
|
||||||
| Banshee Helicopters Banshee Helicopter Support |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|