Fun, Learning, Friendship and Mutual Respect

Go Back   HeliFreak > R/C Helicopters > Aerodynamics, Physics and Engineering

Aerodynamics, Physics and Engineering Aerodynamics, Physics and Engineering Discussions

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2013, 05:38 PM   #1
Registered Users
Posts: 1,231

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norway
Default Pushrod or no pushrod?

Today I found myself wondering about the tail push rod and if it's strictly necessary to have one in the first place. A possible solution could be to mount a servo so that the servo arm is the tail pitch arm one would normally connect to the push rod.

There is at least one possible con:
A servo that far out on the boom would shift CoG. Question is will it have to be too much weight too far aft with a servo powerful enough to control tail pitch?

Possible pros: Fewer links that could pop and with fewer things to adjust like push rod length there would be a simpler mechanical setup.

I say possible and would like to hear what you think. Would the cons out-weight the pros and would there be pros in the first place? Would it be technically feasable and would it offer any benefits?
Blade 400, Blade CX2, Blade mCPx, Blade BL mCPx, Phoenix, RealFlight 7
.... and... err... a plank
If it ain't flyin, it's a downer,
LN400 is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 10:25 PM   #2
Registered Users

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia

A servo is pretty heavy, placed all the way out at the end of the boom and you are looking at quite a bit of weight.

A 60g servo 5x the distance from the CoG compared to the ballast (battery usually), would require 300g to balance it. The tail could be even further out than that so the weight adds up pretty fast.

It would also reduce the flip rate (for a given cyclic input) as the mass is now farther from the axis of rotation. It is best to keep the tail as light as possible.
-MSH MiniProtos Stretched, SK720, DS95/DS95i, Hyp 4S 25C 2500mAh
-MSH Protos Stretched, Brain, Hyp DS16/BLS251, 6S 3000mAh
-Goblin 500, HC3SX, Hyp DH16/MKS980BL, Scorp 4015-1100
desertstalker is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 10:11 AM   #3
Registered Users

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Jakarta indonesia 12131

great information, but I could try this first
oneonesip is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 02:53 PM   #4
Registered Users
Posts: 1,307

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SoCal, USA

Good thinking.

But also ever tail tap might result in a jacked up tail servo, that might get expensive real quick.

But also I have a forward CoG now, so maybe moving the tail servo back some would center the overall weight? Hmm.
jaybyrd is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:38 PM   #5
Registered Users
Posts: 226

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United States

I did it on my old Raptor 60. It worked and there was very little flex in the pushrod (because it was about a half inch long. I just ran a long extension back to the boom with some zipties. It looked different and seemed to work fairly well. As long as you put the servo underneath the boom so the blades hit the boom and not the servo first .

That being said, I got rid of my Raptor and now have an Avant with the servo where it is meant to be, running a pushrod
anthony7820 is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 07:17 PM   #6
Registered Users
Posts: 3,034

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada

I've done this on a camera-ship that needs the weight back there anyway. Works well.

Managing Director
NOVAerial Robotics Inc.
R_Lefebvre is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2015, 11:14 AM   #7
Registered Users

Join Date: May 2015
Location: spain

minuta de hierba.
zoraya is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2016, 09:41 PM   #8
Registered Users
Posts: 1,982

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NorCali (San Jose)

It depends on your goal.
If wild, smack style 3D is the goal, you want as much mass centrally located as close to the center of rotation on all three axis
The center of rotation on a conventional helicopter is the main rotor head block for cyclic and the main mast for rotation.
That's why the motor, batteries and servos are mounted close to the main blades.

If you want sedate, then just replace the tail drive, tail servo and all the mechanical stuff with a brushless motor and the tail rotor ESC. Like the small helis.
ticedoff8 is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2016, 12:32 PM   #9
Registered Users

Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Jakarta

vote for pushrod
dewafitnes is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 03:33 AM   #10
Registered Users

Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: majalengka

Ho fatto questo su una fotocamera nave ha bisogno del peso indietro comunque. Funziona bene.
fenuz is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2017, 09:51 AM   #11
Registered Users
Posts: 100

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saint Peters, MO

If it was a good idea all the Heli manufacturers would do it. The fact that most the best designs do not should answer your question.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
PULSE is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2017, 10:09 AM   #12
Registered Users
Posts: 4,026

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sagnasty, Michigan/VTA CA

Don't see any real benefit, not like the pushrod is a problematic part.

Sticking it on the end of the tail will decrease mechanical gain and increase the chances of it getting damaged in a crash, struck by the blades or stripping the gears which almost never happens with the current locations manufacturers use, all to gain.....well, nothing really??
x3Mini Protos 6s stretch/KDS Chase 360/Trex450 sport v2 dfc/180cfx/SK540's, YGE/YEP/Xnova/Scorpion/MKS/KST/ When did Americans go from strong and proud to a bunch of whining pansies? Our forefathers are rolling over in their graves.
learnedthehardway is online now        Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2017, 10:21 AM   #13
Registered Users
Posts: 16,773

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Santa Clara, Ca

Sticking 100g out on the tail would destroy tail performance. Horrible whipping. Bad stops.

When designing an airframe you want as little mass as possible out on the tail..few grams for CG adjustment is fine. Whole servo is catastrophic.
OnTheSnap is offline        Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2017, 10:26 AM   #14
Registered Users
Posts: 851

Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado

in theory push rods have a drag coexi. so if the drag is reduced to direct link, it will have a better response... i recall the same thing happening to servo geometry.. the links got shorter as the servos are closer to the axis its controlling. i think that made a big diff and as long as you can get it to work practically its just a reworking with mild benefits...i can only see 3d smack pilots noticing.

push rods are sometimes weak, snap, and have drag under extreme load i can see the benefit for those guys hammering piro moves and stressing the system. my align push rod wore out after 300 flights, has a 10 degree bend, its the thinnest thing.
cureuil AS355n.50 600mm - Lynx 450xl ntm1700kv 350mm- KDS Chase 360mm Scorpion 1880kv SK720be/Ikon
Waxxingibbous is online now        Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 11:14 AM   #15
Posts: 2,228

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ILL,Annoy

Opening shot - big servo out on the tail:

DX6i (x2); Eachine FatBee (Hacked-Bee) FB90; Blade Inductrix FPV, 180CFX (x2), 400; Thunder Tiger Mini-Titan E325 V1, SE & TT; Century Swift 16, NX, N4022E Jet Ranger; Hirobo Quark SRB (x3); Flyzone Sensei; E-Flite Apprentice 15e; Phoenix; RF7.5;
FR4-Pilot is offline        Reply With Quote

Go Back   HeliFreak > R/C Helicopters > Aerodynamics, Physics and Engineering

Aerodynamics, Physics and Engineering Aerodynamics, Physics and Engineering Discussions

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Copyright © 2004-2016 by, LLC except where otherwise indicated. The logo is a trademark of, LLC.