![]() |
|
| Register | FAQ | PM | News | Events | Groups | Blogs | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Unregistered
|
||||||
| Aerial Videography and Photography Aerial Video/Photo from R/C Helicopters |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vermont
|
Not really, because most of those lenses will not cover a full frame anyway, so effectively they are being used right to the edges. The only one that does, to my knowledge is the 16-35L. The canon 10-20 and sigma are all crop frame lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
|
Really? What is the crop factor on them? When used on a full-frame camera with the crop worked in, does a 10mm actually look like a 10, or more?
Kind of annoying because, I've got the cheapy 55mm Canon prime lens, but on my camera, it's like an 88mm which makes it harder to use, especially indoors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered Users
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vermont
|
They're still rated the same way. 10mm is 10mm, which on the APS-C is 'like' a 16mm on a full frame. Consequently, a crop-frame lens will vignette on a full frame chip.
It is annoying sometimes, but I think full-frame would annoy me now, because aps-c closely resembles a 35mm motion picture cam, and to know what a 50mm is like on a cinema camera is more helpful to me. I have never flown with a 5D but I bet it's much better for AP/AV because you can get a wider view without needing a super wide lens. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Unregistered
|
||||||
| Aerial Videography and Photography Aerial Video/Photo from R/C Helicopters |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|