Thread: Telemetry?
View Single Post
Old 01-07-2017, 04:22 AM   #28 (permalink)
seefest
Registered Users
 
Posts: 5,901
 

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Southeastern Massachusetts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder Fighter View Post
As someone who has flown with mAh telemetry for several years with heli's I can say it is the most reliable method available.

The issues you bring up are easily solved. I have a voltage alarm that activates when I first plug in the pack so I always know my packs are above 95% when I put them in the heli, I also always have a low voltage alarm set so if by some case something goes wrong with the mAh measurement I have a backup that should stop me damaging my packs.

For the multiple size packs I can setup a switch to take account of the pack capacity I put into the heli but now with LUA and the Jeti and some great work by Teros on his RC-Thoughts web page you can automate it so the capacity limit is set by the RFid tag attached to the pack that updates the application on the Tx via telemetry. The Vcontrol also has the capability to do this in an automated way with RFid tags.

You can tweak the capacity measurement to bring the packs down at a consistent level every time and adjust over time if you have packs coming down lower as they age. With the RFid method you can burn a new tag when required at a lower capacity so it is all automated.

With all of this it is a pretty foolproof system, I always leave a little in hand and alarm at 70% used so by the time I land I am well within 25% remaining and this little buffer takes into account any issues with small capacity differences between packs and temperature over the range I fly in.

Voltage measurement in flight might be fine for sports or scale pilots where the load is fairly consistent but it just doesn't work for flying 3D flight and especially when you fly very different headspeeds. Even with averaging of the voltage, if I set my alarm where needed when flying in my fastest head speed and throwing around the heli the voltage drops are large, so will need to be down in the low 3v range, then if I take my lowest head speed which cuts the current draw and load (i.e. voltage drop) on the pack down by 75% (even doing 3d) the cutoff will be way too low.

I could say the same thing about the voltage method in that this might work fine for someone who always flys the same head speed and style in a flight, but I can tell you that when flying very different head speeds (e.g. 1350/1650/1900rpm) and styles of flight within one flight the mAh method is by far the most foolproof and workable solution.

//Dennis.
Well said.
__________________
SAB KRAKEN JIVE 120, BK CYCLIC, BK TAIL, PYRO 750-500, THUNDERBOLT, VBAR
GOBLIN BT SPORT HELIJIVE 120, BK CYCLIC, BK TAIL, XNOVA 4525 530, SWITCH, VBAR
GOBLIN 570 JIVE 120, MKS SERVOS, XNOVA , SWITCH MAINS, KBDD TAILS, VBAR
seefest is offline        Reply With Quote