View Single Post
Old 02-26-2019, 10:00 PM   #327 (permalink)
navigator2011
Registered Users
 
Posts: 3,118
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Fullerton, CA
Default

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your detail response! You did more research than I did!

In no way am I promoting Walkera as superior to Blade's products! For real, the CB100 was terrible in many ways. I wish I could go back in time and get an MCPX instead. I'd probably be a better pilot today had I known this back then.

But, those Walkera nanos did have double-brushless motors options. The CB100 came all brushless, and for the Genius there was a full brushless upgrade. So, my point is that the miniaturization is not the problem, nor the cost. It can be done with 10-year-old tech. There is not a technological barrier to Blade offering a fully brushless nano. It's only an issue of motivation, I think.
__________________
navigator2011
Fusion 180 / OMP Hobby M2 & M1 / TBS Tango 2 / Radiomaster TX16S.
Navi's Channel / Navi's RCGroups Blog
navigator2011 is online now        Reply With Quote