Fun, Learning, Friendship and Mutual Respect START  HERE


Unregistered
Go Back   HeliFreak > R/C Helicopter Support > Bergen R/C Helicopters


Bergen R/C Helicopters Bergen Intrepid 90 Intrepid Turbine Observer Industrial Twin Observer Turbine Support Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2006, 09:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered Users
 

Join Date: May 2005
Default Push-Pull Tail Setup

Chris posted some excellent instructions a while back that descibed how to set up the upgrade push-pull tail on an Intrepid. With his permission I have reproduced them for everyone to read.

One note from Chris: Although the instructions show a Futaba GY401 gyro being installed, they have found that the push-pull tail assembly doesn't not offer enough throw for a GY401 to work well. The "limit" setting on the GY401 needs to be above 100% for best operation. The push-pull assembly requires that the limit be near it's lowest position. This leads to poor tail performance and low gain settings to compensate for the loss of resolution.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf push-pull_tail_setup.pdf (2.19 MB, 2246 views)
__________________
Paul

Blade mCX
Trex 450XL HDE / Astro 803T / CC35
Bergen Intrepid Gasser x 2
PaulH is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-07-2006, 10:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulH
Chris posted some excellent instructions a while back that descibed how to set up the upgrade push-pull tail on an Intrepid. With his permission I have reproduced them for everyone to read.

One note from Chris: Although the instructions show a Futaba GY401 gyro being installed, they have found that the push-pull tail assembly doesn't not offer enough throw for a GY401 to work well. The "limit" setting on the GY401 needs to be above 100% for best operation. The push-pull assembly requires that the limit be near it's lowest position. This leads to poor tail performance and low gain settings to compensate for the loss of resolution.
I don't suppose the newer pilot (like myself) would notice a big problem with the 401. My limit is set at 85 to obtain full travel with no contact on either side.
Helisin is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-07-2006, 10:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

Nice of you to post it. Thanks!
Helisin is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-08-2006, 06:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered Users
Thread Starter Thread Starter
 

Join Date: May 2005
Default

The only thing that you might notice is that you have to drop the gain fairly low so that the tail doesn't wag. That means the gyro won't hold the tail as well as it could. There will be a higher chance of it drifting.

Chris, jump in here if I'm totally off-base, but I think that's what I remember you telling me.
__________________
Paul

Blade mCX
Trex 450XL HDE / Astro 803T / CC35
Bergen Intrepid Gasser x 2
PaulH is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-03-2007, 05:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 344
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Default

I was just comparing the pdf instructions to the instructions I got with my brand new, recently purchased push pull kit. In the pdf you posted, it says to put the two balls on the short end of the arm. In the instructions that come with the pushpull kit I just got, it says to put them on the long arm. Which is correct???
I know it works o.k. on my first Bergen on the long side. Was this a typo or a revision to instructions that come with upgrade?
Also, the instructions that come with the kit (#7033) have you mount the two balls on the arm on the left side of the arm, servo side, and the pdf version has them screwed in on on the right side of the arm,which is opposite side. Do different kit versions have different length control arm pivot posts?

Last edited by SeaHawk; 10-04-2007 at 06:07 AM..
SeaHawk is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-07-2007, 09:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 7,361
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Apr 2004
Default

I'm not ignoring you Gary, I'm checking into it. I do know we changed where to put the balls, but off the top of my head I cannot remember which is the proper way...


Edit


Ok, Use the PDF instructions. We changed the balls to give a mechanical advantage due to the weak (27 oz/in) servo. It also allows for a higher limit setting required for the 401.
__________________
Chris D. Bergen
Bergen R/C Helicopters

Last edited by cbergen; 10-07-2007 at 09:52 PM.. Reason: additional info
cbergen is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-07-2007, 09:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 344
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Default

I imagine it doesn't make that much difference, but we all know that assumptions are not always correct, so best to ask.
SeaHawk is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-07-2007, 09:52 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 726
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Apr 2005
Default

this is my setup




miami6 is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-29-2009, 09:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Mar 2009
Default

How will the 601 perform using this push-pull setup?
F6Hawk is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-29-2009, 11:35 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 7,361
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Apr 2004
Default

We do NOT recommend the Push-Pull system with Futaba gyros and servos, although I have not tried the new GY520 yet...
__________________
Chris D. Bergen
Bergen R/C Helicopters
cbergen is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-29-2009, 05:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Mar 2009
Default

Ok, I read that with the 401, now it is ALL Futubas, eh?

Forgive my noobiness, but why? The gyro just sends drive info to the servos, so how can it be a bad thing to use with push/pull? What gyro DO you recommend?
F6Hawk is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-29-2009, 07:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 7,361
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Apr 2004
Default

We've found that with the 401 especially, it performs best when the travel limit on the gyro is set between 100 and 120. This is impossible to do with the push pull setup.

The 601/611 similarly works best with high travel limit settings, again difficult to do with the push pull system.

JR gyros do not seem to have this "limitation", so work well either way.
__________________
Chris D. Bergen
Bergen R/C Helicopters
cbergen is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-29-2009, 07:23 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 7,361
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Apr 2004
Default

For gyro recomendations......The only one I've had difficulty with was the JR 770 3D. But that was on my electric, not the Gasser.

I REALLY like the Spartan DS 760 with a JR 8900G servo. Simple setup, and just plain works!!
__________________
Chris D. Bergen
Bergen R/C Helicopters
cbergen is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-30-2009, 06:10 AM   #14 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 18,335
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Default

BTW the 770 also likes high limit settings, but I was able to get it pretty high by reversing the ends of the push-pull arm, so put the ball to the tail pushrod on the SHORT end, and use the outer hole on the tail bellcrank.

But haven't had it in the air enough to see how well it works.

If not, Spartan time.
__________________
Terry
AMA#47402, IRCHA # 3395
Blade CP "Pro", Trex 450SE, PiccoZ, Quick of Japan EP8v2 EX, Hurricane 550, Hurricane 200, JR Vibe 50, Blade mCX, Bergen Intrepid Gasser, Pantera 50, Blade mSR, Novus CP
Pinecone is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-30-2009, 08:02 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Mar 2009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbergen View Post
We've found that with the 401 especially, it performs best when the travel limit on the gyro is set between 100 and 120. This is impossible to do with the push pull setup.
Sorry, Chris, I guess I don't understand the gyro enough to grasp the concept.

I thought the gyro just sensed (uncommanded) heading changes, and put in opposite inputs to maintain heading hold to the servos. So really, the servos are doing the work, based on electrical output from the gyro, right?

If so, then why does a push-pull differ from a single-arm servo? Other than less slop, doesn't one get the same travel? I mean, the pushrods are the same length, right? Just two of them, instead of one.

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I only have single-arm servos in front of me, and can't see what else may be going on via web pics.
F6Hawk is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-30-2009, 10:02 PM   #16 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 7,361
 
My HF Map location
Join Date: Apr 2004
Default

If you look at this pic, you can see our push pull setup for the tail rudder. The push pull linkages only go as far as the vertical bellcrank. THEN the pushrod (single pushrod) goes from there back to the tail bellcrank.

The placement of the balls gives some mechanical advantage (or disdvanatage, depending), Which also changes the limits of travel.

It's these limits of travel that seem to dictate how well (or how bad) the gyro operates. Consider the resolution of the servo (steps), Higher travel limits give greater resolution (more steps), whereas less travel limit, less rsolution.

The gyro/servo combination works as a team, and works best within a certain resolution. Some gyro/servo combinations work in larger lattitudes, others liek the 401 seem to be best at between 100 and 120 on the travel limit set on the gyro.

I found the same with the 601/611 gyro, that it worked better WITHOUT the push-pull system.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4017.jpg
Views:	329
Size:	48.9 KB
ID:	94711   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4016.jpg
Views:	307
Size:	64.8 KB
ID:	94712  
__________________
Chris D. Bergen
Bergen R/C Helicopters
cbergen is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-01-2009, 06:11 AM   #17 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 18,335
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Default

Basically, due to the arm that Bergen uses, you can't put the ball in close enough to get the gyro in its sweet spot.

What you need is a custom arm, with the two balls spaced for the outer holes of a large servo wheel, with holes for the ball to the tail pushrod at various distances from center to tune the gyro/servo/tail setup.
__________________
Terry
AMA#47402, IRCHA # 3395
Blade CP "Pro", Trex 450SE, PiccoZ, Quick of Japan EP8v2 EX, Hurricane 550, Hurricane 200, JR Vibe 50, Blade mCX, Bergen Intrepid Gasser, Pantera 50, Blade mSR, Novus CP
Pinecone is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-03-2009, 07:40 AM   #18 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 147
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Default

If you move the ball out on the tail rotor bell crank
Then you can increase travel, NO?

BTW adjustable links on tail blades is great.

Don't have one yet, its coming, just trying to absorb all I
can from these posts so excuse me also if I'm missing
the obvious.
__________________
Ernie
Flyin For Fun
Raptor 90, X-Cell 1005 Gasser/SE/Tempest Hybrid, Ion-X
44 Magnum FBL...Skookum....
Waiver #RW4030

Last edited by ernatz; 05-03-2009 at 07:44 AM.. Reason: spelling
ernatz is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-03-2009, 08:09 AM   #19 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 18,335
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Default

It helps. But seems it still isn't enough for the Futaba gyros.
__________________
Terry
AMA#47402, IRCHA # 3395
Blade CP "Pro", Trex 450SE, PiccoZ, Quick of Japan EP8v2 EX, Hurricane 550, Hurricane 200, JR Vibe 50, Blade mCX, Bergen Intrepid Gasser, Pantera 50, Blade mSR, Novus CP
Pinecone is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-03-2009, 08:20 AM   #20 (permalink)
Registered Users
 
Posts: 147
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Default

So I've got the right idea, Thanks
__________________
Ernie
Flyin For Fun
Raptor 90, X-Cell 1005 Gasser/SE/Tempest Hybrid, Ion-X
44 Magnum FBL...Skookum....
Waiver #RW4030
ernatz is offline        Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply




Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the HeliFreak forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your REAL and WORKING email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself. Use a real email address or you will not be granted access to the site. Thank you.
Email Address:
Location
Where do you live? ie: Country, State, City or General Geographic Location please.
Name and Lastname
Enter name and last name here. (This information is not shown to the general public. Optional)
Helicopter #1
Enter Helicopter #1 type and equipment.
Helicopter #2
Enter Helicopter #2 type and equipment.
Helicopter #3
Enter Helicopter #3 type and equipment.
Helicopter #4
Enter Helicopter #4 type and equipment.

Log-in


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright © Website Acquisitions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1