What Physics FPS do you get with your system?

[wab223]

Regardless of the glitches I am starting to like Accurc after some tuning. I think it would be useful to get info on the hardware people are running, what Physics FPS (PFPS) they are getting and how the sim actually feels. I know this is a geeky post but with enough info it will be easier for people to determine whether they can run the sim now, if they need a new PC or just need to upgrade components such as CPU or GPU.

The sim flies fine and the graphics quality is pretty decent.

Windows 7,
AMD FX 4100 @ 3.6 Ghz
12GB ram
GTX 550 Ti 1GB


SIM:
Resolution: [email protected] Full Screen
Antialiasing Level: AA8
Smoke Quality: N/A only tested electric
Shadow Quality: Low
Frame Skipping: No
Texture Quality: High
Target Framerate: 120fps
VSync: Off

Control System FPS: 800
Physic: Auto
Enable Graphics Multithreading: Yes

Results:
Physics: 370 to 400

[OnTheSnap]

Win 7
I5.2500K Overclocked to 3.6GHZ
NVIDIA GTX 760
8GB

I'm getting 750 to 800 PFPS. Vsync off, 120 fps. 1080P.

I wonder why you get half the performance? The i5 has 4 cores, but supports hyper threading. So it takes 8 threads. I wonder if that's the reason?

Tried it on a haswell 2.6 ghz dual core. Not usable. 100 PFPS.

[dl5973]

I have a Laptop

Win 7
I7 2670QM at 2.20 GHZ Processor
Nvidia GEForce 525M -video card
4GB Ram

My Physics fluctuates around the 350FPS Mark

Sim Graphics
Vsync - enabled
60FPS- selected

[02DropTopM3]

I think there are a ton of variables that affect this so I'll be a little more verbose:

Laptop:

Macbook Pro Retina (Late 2013)
Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64 (Bootcamp)
Intel Core i7-3740QM @ 2.70GHz
16GB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

SIM:
Resolution: [email protected] (1080p) Full Screen
Antialiasing Level: AA8
Smoke Quality: High
Shadow Quality: High
Frame Skipping: No
Texture Quality: High
Target Framerate: 120fps
VSync: Off

Control System FPS: 800
Physic: Auto
Enable Graphics Multithreading: Yes

Results:
Graphics FPS: 80 - 115
Physics: 369 - 466

[mkovalcson]

Workstation ( home built )
i7- 2600K - 3.40GHz ( 8 cores )
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
16Gb DDR3 RAM
Samsung 840 - SSD boot drive
3 x Dell 24" 1920x1200 monitors.
Total Bithead digital preamp to self amplified M-Audio monitor speakers

Resolution:1920x1200
Antialiasing Level: AA8
Smoke Quality: High
Shadow Quality: High
Frame Skipping: No
Texture Quality: High
Target Framerate: 120fps
VSync: Off

Control System FPS: 800
Physic: Auto
Enable Graphics Multithreading: Yes

Graphics FPS: ------ 121-123
Physics: --------------- 610-726

[velocity90]

Everything high
120fps - vsync off

Run in window (saves you 16ms latency! Compared to full screen, harder on the graphics)

Nvidia gtx 650 ti boost

i5 750 2.67 quad

Fps 120
Pfps around 488

[02DropTopM3]

Ha!

You win Mark. That is a smoking laptop!!

[mkovalcson]

Originally Posted by 02DropTopM3

Ha!

You win Mark. That is a smoking laptop!!

I said it was a workstation. My CoreDuo Laptop is 6 years old and doesn't have enough omph for this simulator.

[02DropTopM3]

Originally Posted by mkovalcson

I said it was a workstation...

Ah, ok, but you still win.

[mkovalcson]

Originally Posted by 02DropTopM3

Ah, ok, but you still win.

OnTheSnap said he was getting physics @ 750-800

[heli-insane]

SIM:
Resolution: 1920X1080 Full Screen
Antialiasing Level: AA8
Smoke Quality: High
Shadow Quality: High
Frame Skipping: No
Texture Quality: High
Target Framerate: 120fps
VSync: On
Physics FPS-840 Can also run at max 900 but cause FPS to drop to about 115, rock solid at 840.
Graphics FPS-120+
Control system FPS-800
Automatic Physics FPS-No
Enable Multi-threading-Yes

Results:
Physics: 840+ FPS and sim runs perfect.
Computer Specs
I5-2500k CPU @3.4 GHZ Not over clocked with stock settings.
Ram- 16 Gbs
Video Card- Zotac GTX 580 Amp edition
Monitor- Asus 29 inch 3D monitor 120HZ
SSD- 128 gbs
HD- 1 TB
Accurc also runs perfect with Nvidia 3D glasses and Asus Monitor.

[AcidDrink]

I7 4790K 4ghz stock, 16 GB ram geforce 780ti, 1080p 120Hz, physics 800-900
q6600 2.7 ghz, 4gb ram, geforce 660ti, 1050, 120hz, physics 390-480.

Control lag on both. Much less so with vsync unlocked.

[highlightshadow]

Windows 8.1,
Core i7-3770 @ 3.4Ghz
32GB ram
GeForce GTX680MX w/ 2GB GDDR5


SIM:
Resolution: 2560x1440 Full Screen
Antialiasing Level: AA4
Smoke Quality: High
Shadow Quality: Medium
Frame Skipping: No
Texture Quality: High
Target Framerate: 120fps
VSync: Off

Control System FPS: 800
Physic: Auto
Enable Graphics Multithreading: Yes

Results:
Physics: about 500-600fps

[wab223]

Originally Posted by OnTheSnap

I wonder why you get half the performance? The i5 has 4 cores, but supports hyper threading. So it takes 8 threads. I wonder if that's the reason?

The Intel chips posted so far do seem to have a significant performance advantage over my AMD. I've been building my home PCs with AMD chips for at least 25 years (absolute cutting edge not normally being required).
I expected I might be low down the totem on this but I am suprised in the PFPS rates you guys are getting.
I do wonder if Accurc could be using intel optimised function libraries that are not working as well for AMD (conspiracy - lol!). I went out and bought a GTX 760 yesterday. The sim works even better but no suprise my PFPS only jumped up 9 points to 409.
We need more AMD data or I might end up building an intel machine and that will turn out to be a very expensive sim.

[velocity90]

Originally Posted by wab223

The Intel chips posted so far do seem to have a significant performance advantage over my AMD. I've been building my home PCs with AMD chips for at least 25 years (absolute cutting edge not normally being required).
I expected I might be low down the totem on this but I am suprised in the PFPS rates you guys are getting.
I do wonder if Accurc could be using intel optimised function libraries that are not working as well for AMD (conspiracy - lol!). I went out and bought a GTX 760 yesterday. The sim works even better but no suprise my PFPS only jumped up 9 points to 409.
We need more AMD data or I might end up building an intel machine and that will turn out to be a very expensive sim.

Pfps is cpu specific, not graphic card specific. Im surprised that the i5s score higher. Although my computer store also said this and they weren't a fan of the i7 for some reason. (that was some years ago)

[wab223]

Yes, I understand the PFPS is a factor of CPU power. Never the less I was hoping my graphics card was a bottleneck and that switching the card would possibly free up CPU cycles. I was not expecting much and actually did get a small increase.
Accurc appears to be running quite nicely with this GTX760 and my FX 4100. I'l see over the next couple of days how I like it now compared to my other sims.

EDIT: BTW, my chip is almost falling off the bottom of the min spec while the i5 is recommended. This is just to say I think Accurc did a good job in analysing hardware reqs.

[highlightshadow]

Deffo on the CPU ... the Intel core series is much more efficient than AMD's of late ... makes a serious difference

[mkovalcson]

I got my Core Duo laptop to work acceptably.

I have everything turned down, but am running 1920x1080 resolution.

I"m getting
Video fps 85
Physics fps 360-380

I had to turn down the tail gain compared to my workstation.

I can A/B it with RF better now on my big screen HD TV now.

[Luigi_tuga]

Originally Posted by mkovalcson

I got my Core Duo laptop to work acceptably.

I have everything turned down, but am running 1920x1080 resolution.

I"m getting
Video fps 85
Physics fps 360-380

I had to turn down the tail gain compared to my workstation.

I can A/B it with RF better now on my big screen HD TV now.

Nice to know.
I still have some doubts if my i5 750 will run nicely.
I' m planning on doing some oc, but the modern haswell CPU perform so much better

[mkovalcson]

Originally Posted by Luigi_tuga

Nice to know.
I still have some doubts if my i5 750 will run nicely.
I' m planning on doing some oc, but the modern haswell CPU perform so much better

There is a difference between acceptably and nicely. It looks a LOT better on my workstation with all the options turned on.

I'm going to need some additional tax write offs this year. I may justify a high powered laptop. I'm sure I can find "some" other use for it beside as a sim. We'll see...